A significantly upgraded County-class may work in Tier 7 through gimmicks and soft-stats tweaks though.Īs some of the best treaty cruisers of the 1930s like Algerie, New Orleans and Zara now occupied Tier 7, at least I think Tier 7 of British CA should be the canceled Surrey-class heavy cruisers with significantly improved, though still of fairly questionable effectiveness in game, armor protection with an 140-mm belt and 70-mm deck. On the other hand, it would be very easy for Wargaming to choose and produce a county-class premium not only for the British but for the Commonwealth as well. Which specific ship to choose remains a problem, and we may observe significant upgrades of armor belt thickness when mounting the B-hull as many earlier County-class cruisers have upgraded their armor protection during their service. and Italian heavy cruisers, I think that the actually-built County-class should be placed at Tier 6 as typical representives of the earlier, 1920s generation of Treaty cruisers alongside with Pensacola and Trento. And instead demote Hawkins to Tier 4 where she would work better there.Īccording to the arrangement of French, U.S. A friend of mine have once claimed that there existed interim studies of British heavy cruisers of an AB-X layout of twin 190-mm turrents based on a hull developed from Hawkins-class (seems somewhat like a British Aoba, both in configuration and in development history), maybe it would work better here. Hawkins-class at Tier 5 may be a bit underpowered, similiar to the case of Emerald: World War-I era guns and a both outdated and inefficient layout. At the request of the original poster, I would like to express some of my personal thoughts on the proposed British Heavy Cruiser branch at the cost of digging this thread up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |